Click to jump to a data section on this page
Increased Sensitivity using Significantly Less FFPE Sample
MAUI Hybridization System vs. Coverslip Using Invitrogen NCode miRNA Microarrays
MAUI Hybridization System vs. Coverslip Using Exiqon miRCURY LNA microRNA Arrays
MAUI Hybridization System vs. Coverslip Using Phalanx Biotech OneArray Microarrays
Increased Sensitivity & Precision Due to Active Mixing
| Competitor A![]() |
Competitor B![]() | |
MAUI Hybridization System![]() |
| Coverslip Hybridization | MAUI Hybridization System |
| |
![]() | |
| The MAUI Hybridization System provides greatly enhanced sensitivity (up to 10 fold) and excellent inter-array reproducibility. Additionally, the intensities of positive features are greater than 10X median background intensity in both channels. | |
| Coverslip Hybridization | MAUI Hybridization System |
| ![]() |
| Coverslip- Enlarged | MAUI Hybridization System- Enlarged |
![]() | ![]() |
| (A) | (B) |
![]() | ![]() |
| (C) Observed Differential Expression (MAUI vs. Coverslip) | |
![]() | |
| (D) Spike-In Variation (MAUI vs. Coverslip) | |
![]() | |
| The MAUI Hybridization System yields higher signal intensity & SNR compared to coverslip hybridization (Figures A & B) and higher differential expression as seen by the log-ratio vs. log-ratio plot comparing the 2 methods (Figure C). The MAUI Hybridization System also provides for less variation between spot replicates (Figure D) | |
| Coverslip Hybridization | MAUI Hybridization System |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
| The MAUI Hybridization System yields significantly higher signal intensity compared to coverslip hybridization as seen by the Cy3/Cy5 intensity average and Log2 plot. | |
| No Mixing | MAUI Hybridization System- Active Mixing |
| |
| No Mixing R2 = 0.850 | Active Mixing R2 = 0.940 |
![]() | ![]() |